Incitement to Violence or Hatred: When freedom of speech is used to incite violence or promote hatred against a particular group, religion, or way of life, it can lead to social unrest or conflict within a nation. Governments may argue that such speech threatens the country's stability and sovereignty.

Defamation of National Symbols or Leaders: Speech that defames or insults national symbols, leaders, or institutions can be seen as undermining a country's image and authority on the global stage, potentially harming its sovereignty in the realm of international relations.

Advocating Separatism or Secession: Expressing support for separatist movements or advocating for the breakup of a country can be considered a threat to national unity and sovereignty, particularly if it leads to unrest or rebellion.

Foreign Interference: When individuals or organisations within a nation receive support or funding from foreign entities to promote certain ideologies or actions, it may raise concerns about foreign interference in a country's internal affairs and sovereignty.

Tell me, on which factor has the judiciary been successful in maintaining the check balance?

To do so, we need people who aspire to rise above their compulsions, obsessions, and conditioned mindsets. One who compromises on fulfilling his ambition and discards the larger vision should be restricted from entering the noble profession of legal interpretation.

If you lose your wealth, you lose nothing. If you lose your health, you lose something, but if you lose your character, you lose everything.

Thus, it's high time that the judiciary take initiative in laying a strong foundation for the upcoming challenges they encounter, irrespective of the party, group, religion, etc.

Thus, executing contempt of court in the right context is the need of the hour.

- Atul Tyagi
© Solutions in terms of clarity for life.
#law #judiciary #legalities #freedomofspeech